Minutes:
Emma Sheridan, Business Unit Leader for Community Services, Policy and Performance, introduced the report which presented to the Cabinet Grants Panel 13 Community Grant applications. She noted where applications that have no award recommended, due to applications not meeting the criteria of the Community Grants scheme, officers were providing ongoing assistance to organisations to seek other sources of grant funding. She drew attention to the application from Age UK West Sussex, Brighton & Hove which is significantly larger than most grants issued under the scheme however confirmed that it is linked to wider investment in the Keymer Brick and Tile development where the developer has provided the building but additional funding is required for fixtures and fittings.
The applications which were recommended for consideration by the Panel are set out below:
Organisation |
Grant Purpose |
Award Requested |
Award Suggested |
Age UK West Sussex, Brighton & Hove |
Support to equip Kings Weald Community Centre (Keymer Brick & Tile) |
£20,000 |
£20,000 |
Burgess Hill Shed |
Materials to set up a workshop for The Kiln |
£2,700 |
£2,700 |
Carers Support West Sussex |
Check in and Chat befriending service |
£5,000 |
£5,000 |
Hassocks Baby Group |
Volunteer run parent and baby group |
£490 |
£490 |
Sheddingdean Community Association |
Rental costs |
£3,157.60 |
£3,157.60 |
Sussex Clubs for Young People |
Youth sessions at Court Bushes |
£5,000 |
£5,000 |
Windmills Opportunity Playgroup |
Rental costs |
£537.95 |
£537.95 |
Part fund Premier League Kicks project in Burgess Hill and Oathall |
£4,999 |
£4,999 |
|
|
TOTAL |
£41,884.55 |
£41,794.55 |
The Vice-Chairman enquired whether there are break options in the contract Burgess Hill Shed have with their landlord. He also felt pleased to see the application from Hassocks Baby Group come forward as during the pandemic parent and toddler baby groups have not functioned with parents not able to access essential peer to peer support.
The Chairman echoed the comments of the Vice-Chairman.
The Member expressed that he was happy to support the recommendations. He noted that there was a number of applications arising from the southern part of the District and not from the north and asked whether there was any particular reason for it. He referred to the application from Albion in the Community and queried whether they could organise events in the northern part of the District as many residents are fans of Brighton and Hove Albion F.C.
The Business Unit Leader for Community Services, Policy and Performance confirmed that in relation to the geographic spread, there was a comprehensive review over the last year which provided an indication of an equitable split across the three towns, the rural areas and the north and south of the District. She added that it seems particular to this meeting of the Panel that the majority of the applications arise from the south of the District. However, the split is generally even and officers would raise it with Members’ if they felt that applications where not coming from a particular area of the District or sector of the community. She also confirmed that she would talk to Albion in the Community to encourage a greater engagement in the north of the District and that she does not consider break clauses to bring a risk, as they are included in every lease.
The Chairman took the Panel to vote on all applications.
Members were supportive of the applications.
RESOLVED
The Cabinet Grants Panel agreed:
Supporting documents: